ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
19336 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI300A
+56650%
81.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Dec 2023
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
192GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
19456
8
TMUs
1216
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
750W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
153 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
