ATI FireGL V3600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 375W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (134.4GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
392 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 480 Core 512
+648%
1.078 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Unknown
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1536MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
134.4GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
120
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.86 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.73 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1078 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
73W
TDP
375W
250 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
GF100
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
GF100-ES-DT1-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
