ATI FireGL V3600 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
1160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 SDI
+1188%
1.856 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
May 2011
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Cayman
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
