ATI FireGL V3600 vs AMD FirePro V5900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
392 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
+326%
0.614 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
May 2011
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
512
8
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Cayman
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
