ATI FireGL V3600 vs ATI FirePro V4900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 75W)
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
360 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
+433%
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Nov 2011
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
480
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
73W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Turks
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
