ATI FireGL V3600 vs Intel Arc A750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
3464 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V3600
0.144 TFLOPS
Arc A750
+11844%
17.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2007
Release Date
Oct 2022
FireGL
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
3584
8
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
-
-
-
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
4.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
144.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS
Board Design
73W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
DG2-512
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
