Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro K600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
16192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+15504%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro K600
0.336 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Mar 2013
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
16384
Shading Units
192
1024
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
16
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
408 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.504 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.02 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.4 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
14.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
2400W
TDP
41W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
100 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
