Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
16368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+149700%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Mar 2009
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
16384
Shading Units
16
1024
TMUs
8
0
ROPs
8
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
408 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
2400W
TDP
34W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
G96
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
UMC
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
100 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
