Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
16320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+32668%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Feb 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
16384
Shading Units
64
1024
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
16
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
408 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
2400W
TDP
70W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
65 nm
100 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
