Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
16352 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 600W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max 1550 +78153%
52.43 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2023
Release Date
Sep 2008
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
16384
Shading Units
32
1024
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
408 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

600W
TDP
42W
1000 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
80 nm
100 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net