Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (96GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
11264 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1815MHz vs 1550MHz)
Lower TDP (230W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max 1350
+298%
44.44 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000
11.15 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Aug 2018
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
750 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1815 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
96GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
2458GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
14336
Shading Units
3072
896
TMUs
192
0
ROPs
64
896
Tensor Cores
384
112
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
408 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.2 GPixel/s
1389 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.5 GTexel/s
44.44 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.30 TFLOPS
44.44 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.15 TFLOPS
44.44 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
348.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
450W
TDP
230W
850 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-875-A1
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
100 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
