Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
6144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1785MHz vs 1550MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 300W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max 1100
+507%
22.22 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
May 2019
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1575 MHz
1550 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
600 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
7168
Shading Units
1024
448
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
32
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
204 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
694.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
22.22 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
22.22 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
22.22 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
60W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Turing
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
12 nm
100 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
