Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 580
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 580 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4064 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 580 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+23219%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 580
0.072 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Apr 2009
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
4096
Shading Units
32
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
72.00 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
40W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
G96C
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
G96-875-C1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
