Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+47871%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2009
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
8
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
34W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
G96
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
