Home GPU Comparison Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
4064 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +28357%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Sep 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
32
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
G84
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
42W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy