Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)
2752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+683%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro 4100
2.142 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Unknown
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.02GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
4096
Shading Units
1344
256
TMUs
112
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.32 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.26 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.142 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.26 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GK104
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
