Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+3397%
16.79 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Dec 2010
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
4096
Shading Units
192
256
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
-
-
-
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
62W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GF106
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
