Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 122W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+84%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2.169 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jan 2013
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
122W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
GK104
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
