Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+1636%
3.994 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Mar 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
384bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
1024
Shading Units
96
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
8
RT Cores
-
-
-
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
134W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
G80
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
G80-850-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
90 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.0
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
