NVIDIA CMP 90HX vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM CMP 90HX and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 90HX 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1710MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (760.3GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
6320 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 320W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 90HX
+27262%
21.89 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2021
Release Date
Apr 2010
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1188 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
10GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR3
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
760.3GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
50
SM Count
-
6400
Shading Units
80
200
TMUs
8
80
ROPs
4
200
Tensor Cores
-
50
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
5 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
136.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
342.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
21.89 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
21.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
342.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
320W
TDP
17W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA102
GPU Name
Cedar
GA102-100-A1
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
