NVIDIA CMP 70HX vs NVIDIA T1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 70HX and 4GB VRAM T1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 70HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (608.3GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 70HX
+328%
10.71 TFLOPS
T1000
2.5 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
May 2021
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro Turing
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1188 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
608.3GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
14
3840
Shading Units
896
120
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
120
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
167.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
10.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
10.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
167.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
TU117
GA104-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
