NVIDIA CMP 70HX vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 70HX and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1410MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 608.3GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 70HX
10.71 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX
+17%
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2021
Release Date
Sep 2021
Mining GPUs
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1188 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
608.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
70
3840
Shading Units
4480
120
TMUs
280
64
ROPs
128
120
Tensor Cores
280
30
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
167.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
10.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
10.71 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
167.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA104
GPU Name
GA100
GA104-100-A1
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
7 nm
17.4 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
392 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
8.0
6.8
Shader Model
N/A
