NVIDIA CMP 50HX vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3568 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 50HX
+31528%
11.07 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2021
Release Date
Oct 2009
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
1350 MHz
Base Clock
-
1545 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
10GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
320bit
Memory Bus
64bit
560.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
2
3584
Shading Units
16
192
TMUs
8
80
ROPs
4
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
5 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
123.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
296.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
22.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.07 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
346.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
31W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GT216
TU102-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
