NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs NVIDIA T1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 4GB VRAM T1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1650MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA T1000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 185W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX
+204%
7.603 TFLOPS
T1000
2.5 TFLOPS
Blender
CMP 40HX
+206%
1174
T1000
383
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
May 2021
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro Turing
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
36
SM Count
14
2304
Shading Units
896
144
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
32
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
185W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
TU117
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
