NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs ATI Radeon X1650 GTO
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Dec 2007
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
392 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.54GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
-
144
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
185W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI
1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
RV530
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
RV530 LE
Turing
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
90 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
3.0
