NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 8800 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (185W vs 220W)
AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (2430MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.1GB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX
7.603 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 8800 XT
+161%
19.91 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Mining GPUs
Generation
Navi IV(RX 8000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
1295 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
2430 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2438 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
624.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
4096
144
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
96
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
4 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
233.3 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
622.1 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
39.81 TFLOPS
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.91 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
622.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
185W
TDP
220W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
Navi 48
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XT
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
4 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
445 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
