NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 320.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (185W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX
+32%
7.603 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2
5.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Apr 2014
Mining GPUs
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
44
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
2816
144
TMUs
176
64
ROPs
64
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
185W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
Vesuvius
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT
(215-0852022)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.3
