NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD Radeon R7 360
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 57% (1650MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 185W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX
+371%
7.603 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360
1.613 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Jun 2015
Mining GPUs
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
768
144
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
16
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
185W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
Tobago
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO
(215-0875010)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.3
