NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 550
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 185W)
Score
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Apr 2006
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
-
144
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.440 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.880 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
185W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
NV43
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
NV43 GL
Turing
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
110 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
3.0
