NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs NVIDIA NVS 315
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
2256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 185W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX
+7503%
7.603 TFLOPS
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Mar 2013
Mining GPUs
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
36
SM Count
1
2304
Shading Units
48
144
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Board Design
185W
TDP
19W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GF119
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
