NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 78% (1650MHz vs 928MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 336.6GB/s)
Lower TDP (185W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample 's Advantages
576 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX
+42%
7.603 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
5.345 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
875 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
928 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
2880
144
TMUs
240
64
ROPs
48
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.7 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.345 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
185W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GK180
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
GK180-425-A1
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.175
7.5
CUDA
3.5
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
