NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs AMD FirePro RG220A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2224 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 185W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX
+9403%
7.603 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
May 2010
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
36
SM Count
-
2304
Shading Units
80
144
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
185W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
M93
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
