NVIDIA CMP 40HX vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1785MHz vs 1650MHz)
Lower TDP (125W vs 185W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 40HX
+51%
7.603 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX
5.027 TFLOPS
Blender
CMP 40HX
+46%
1174
CMP 30HX
801
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Feb 2021
Mining GPUs
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1470 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1650 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
36
SM Count
22
2304
Shading Units
1408
144
TMUs
88
64
ROPs
48
288
Tensor Cores
-
36
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
105.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
237.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
15.21 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
7.603 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
237.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
185W
TDP
125W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
TU116
TU106-100-A1
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
