Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (125W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX
5.027 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +62%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2021
Release Date
Aug 2015
Mining GPUs
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
1408
Shading Units
4096
88
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Fiji
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

125W
TDP
175W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy