NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX 540 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 125W)
Score
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Aug 2004
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
250 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
-
88
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.200 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
125W
TDP
25W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
NV43
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
NV43 GL
Turing
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
110 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
3.0
