NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs ATI FirePro V5800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V5800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (74W vs 125W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX
+355%
5.027 TFLOPS
FirePro V5800
1.104 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Apr 2010
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
10
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
800
88
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.04 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
27.60 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1104 GFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
125W
TDP
74W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Juniper
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
Juniper XT GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.04 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
166 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
