NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs AMD FirePro D300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX
+131%
5.027 TFLOPS
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Jan 2014
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
162.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
1280
88
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.176 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
136.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Pitcairn
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
