NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1328 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 125W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX
+6183%
5.027 TFLOPS
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Apr 2010
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
80
88
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
125W
TDP
17W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Cedar
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
