NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs ATI FireGL V8650
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX
+1042%
5.027 TFLOPS
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Aug 2007
Mining GPUs
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR4
192bit
Memory Bus
512bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
320
88
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
125W
TDP
Unknown
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
R600
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
