NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs Intel Arc A750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (125W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (2400MHz vs 1785MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 336.0GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 30HX
5.027 TFLOPS
Arc A750
+242%
17.2 TFLOPS
Blender
CMP 30HX
801
Arc A750
+173%
2188
Graphics Card
Feb 2021
Release Date
Oct 2022
Mining GPUs
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
2050 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
3584
88
TMUs
224
48
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS
Board Design
125W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
DG2-512
TU116-100-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
6 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
