Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (1410MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +1466%
12.63 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 350 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
May 2015
Mining GPUs
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

70
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
4480
Shading Units
384
280
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
8
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Oland
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy