Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro V7350X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1410MHz vs 1243MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (200W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +120%
12.63 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V7350X2
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
1188 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1243 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

70
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
36
4480
Shading Units
2304
280
TMUs
144
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Ellesmere
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
7 nm
Process Size
14 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
200W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy