Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (1740MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (90W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +77%
12.63 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
7.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
1545 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

70
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
4480
Shading Units
2048
280
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.4 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.127 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.127 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
111.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GA107
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
GA107-140-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
7 nm
Process Size
8 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
90W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
8.6
N/A
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy