NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 384MB VRAM GeForce 9600 GSO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 384GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
4384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (84W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+4684%
12.63 TFLOPS
GeForce 9600 GSO
0.264 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Apr 2008
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
384MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
192bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
70
SM Count
12
4480
Shading Units
96
280
TMUs
48
128
ROPs
12
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.40 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
264.0 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
84W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
G92
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
