NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 256MB VRAM GeForce 8600 GTS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
4448 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+13480%
12.63 TFLOPS
GeForce 8600 GTS
0.093 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Apr 2007
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
70
SM Count
4
4480
Shading Units
32
280
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.80 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.80 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
60W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
G84
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
G84-400-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
