NVIDIA CMP 170HX vs ATI FirePro V4900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+1544%
12.63 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900
0.768 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Nov 2011
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
480
280
TMUs
24
128
ROPs
8
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Turks
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.0
