Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB vs NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 96GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB and 16GB VRAM CMP 100HX 210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 60% (1837MHz vs 1147MHz)
More VRAM (96GB vs 16GB)
11776 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (829.4TB/s vs 4.10TB/s)
Lower TDP (250W vs 1000W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
B200 SXM 192 GB +428%
62.08 TFLOPS
CMP 100HX 210
11.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2024
Release Date
Jan 2020
Tesla Blackwell
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1665 MHz
Base Clock
555 MHz
1837 MHz
Boost Clock
1147 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
810 MHz

Memory

96GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM3e
Memory Type
HBM2
4096bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
4.10TB/s
Bandwidth
829.4GB/s

Render Config

132
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
16896
Shading Units
5120
528
TMUs
320
24
ROPs
128
528
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
256 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
96 KB (per SM)
50 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

44.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
146.8 GPixel/s
969.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
367.0 GTexel/s
248.3 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
23.49 TFLOPS
62.08 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.75 TFLOPS
31.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.873 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GB100
GPU Name
GV100
-
GPU Variant
-
Blackwell
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
208 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
Unknown
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

1000W
TDP
250W
1400 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
9.0
CUDA
7.0
N/A
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy