Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor

Intel Arctic Sound 2T vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T and 4GB VRAM Tesla T10 Processor to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
7440 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor 's Advantages
Lower TDP (188W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 2T +2121%
13.82 TFLOPS
Tesla T10 Processor
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Apr 2009
Xe Graphics
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
7680
Shading Units
240
240
TMUs
80
120
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

108.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
216.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
27.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
3.456 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
188W
900 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.5
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy