Home GPU Comparison Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000

Intel Arctic Sound 1T vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T and 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
5696 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 350W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arctic Sound 1T +975%
11.06 TFLOPS
Quadro 6000
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Dec 2010
Xe Graphics
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
747 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1229GB/s
Bandwidth
143.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
448
192
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
2.765 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Arctic Sound
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Fermi
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
190 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

350W
TDP
204W
750 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy