Home GPU Comparison Intel Arc Pro A60M vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT

Intel Arc Pro A60M vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400M GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1300MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 19.20GB/s)
2032 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Arc Pro A60M +18262%
5.325 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400M GT
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2023
Release Date
May 2007
Alchemist
Generation
GeForce 8M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
19.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
16
128
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
256
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

83.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.800 GPixel/s
166.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
10.65 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.325 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
28.80 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-256
GPU Name
G86
ACM-G12
GPU Variant
G86-603-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.21 billion
Unknown
Die Size
127 mm²

Board Design

95W
TDP
14W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy